tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15418143.post113220228196465171..comments2024-03-09T05:42:18.102-05:00Comments on Tombone's Computer Vision Blog: shackles of vocabularyTomasz Malisiewiczhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17507234774392358321noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15418143.post-1134513767578996812005-12-13T17:42:00.000-05:002005-12-13T17:42:00.000-05:00mayhaps this nonlinearity is not a result of an in...mayhaps this nonlinearity is not a result of an intended second meaning, but an (subconscious maybe?) attempt at improving vocabulary compatibility. if 2 people are speaking that are familiar with each other's style of language comprehension, the language they use will be of a nature that is best suited (or at least heads in that direction) to their particular vocabularies. in this sense, it's not a second meaning that's created, but a more elaborate context with which to present the primary meaning. this type of conversation viewed objectively (without the unique influence of a particular consciousness and vocabulary), would appear to have a number layers of meaning, instead of one elaborated one.<BR/><BR/>this is not to say that the stealth possiblities aren't utilized, just that an intenionally encoded second meaning probably makes up a minority of these cases... perhaps, who knows..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15418143.post-1132454492268135042005-11-19T21:41:00.000-05:002005-11-19T21:41:00.000-05:00whoa dude. pretty language yo!whoa dude. pretty language yo!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com